Saturday, April 08, 2006

How exactly can an exception prove a rule?

The only way that i can think of is if i were to state that everyone is a lier, and then someone was proven to be telling the truth then i would be proven to be a lier and therfore correct in my statement and therefore not a lier thus creating a parodox.

Perhaps i'm getting the wrong end of the stick, and perhaps there is no stick.
Posted by at

6 comments:

Katiez Furry Mewz said...

Nah, but itz a good shtick...

All depends on the spelling you see.

7:14 AM
Katiez Furry Mewz said...

I'm 983...

See ya latur...

I'm postn new stuff.

And I've got a jobbie again!! Hopefully this one will last longer than the last one!! Blueprint scanning and catalogging piping designs and stuff into a computer database...

And then I'm going to be doing some part time temporal for Google!

#983.

7:46 AM
Katiez Furry Mewz said...

oh there you are... I waz in Doubting Wise. That's why I couldn't find it.

I number 988.

^..^

9:58 PM
Katiez Furry Mewz said...

I'm 989...

I started a comedy troup...We're going to do street performing. We haven't settled on a name yet, but I'm rather partial to The Not Ready For Comedy Club Playerz.

^..^

10:00 PM
Katiez Furry Mewz said...

Well, I missed 1000 by two...

I'm 1002.

^..^

9:48 AM
Phillip R Goodman said...

if i say everyone is a lier and what i'm saying is correct then i'm telling the truth which means that i'm not correct and therefore i'm a lier which means that i am correct and it goes on like that.

8:58 AM

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)