Places on the bus

The child:
When you are a child you instantly gravitate toward a position knowledge and power or at the very least a mimicking of power and thus you gravitate towards the the front of the bus on the top deck.

The teenager:
One would imagine that the teenager would be just as interested in these thing, however they seek a place as far away from any authority as they can get in short they seek freedom, and in so doing they gravitate to the back of the bus on the top deck, this being the point of furthest distance from the bus driver seen in this case as the major point of local authority, this can
[I would imagine] be carried over into just about any other place, particularly the classroom.

The adult:
When you are older [late teens early twenties onwards] I observe that you go more for the middle ground and more often that not sit on the bottom deck of the bus. The only reason for this that I have been able to fathom is that as you become older, for the most part atleast you become less tribal [the exception to this being sporting events and the like] either by way of being more individualistic and less insecure therefore being less subceptable to the mob mentality of self labeling, or you become more homogenised more conforming to the mob mentality of the larger group/society and therefore less subceptable to the mob mentality of smaller more insecure groups/societys.

Where I fit in:
Interestingly I'm twentytwo and yet I only fit into the adult group when I'm on journeys that I know will be no more than fifteen or twenty minutes, on longer journeys however I fit into the first group, the child, in that I always try to sit on the top deck of the bus and right at the front, whatsmore I do it for exactly the same reasons that of having a feeling of power and a greater ability to aquire knowledge of the world around you i.e. liking the view. However I have one other reason, if I were to sit at the back of the bus I would have to not only hear everyone else but allso see them and I prefer to just hear them and combat that by wearing earphones and playing loud music.

Overview:

first you seek power and knowledge then independence a sense of freedom and finally conformity and convenience, however all of these can be seen as a greater search for safety and security, firstly the safety of self power, secondly the security of the group and of keeping a distance from other groups, and finally the safety of blending in and not sticking out, and for myself I suppose it is the security similar the teenager of distancing myself, from everything, the safety of not knowing and not dealing.

Giving better than you get.

You allways have to give as good as get otherwise you're just lying there and taking it but really you should allways give better, and this works both ways:
If someone does something nice for you you should return it three fold, ten fold even because friendship should allways be rewarded,
and likewise emnity:
If some one hits you then you have to hit back even harder or else it'll just be an 'eye for an eye' sort or thing, and soon you'll both be blind, but if you hit back really hard early on then you may be able to prevent the fight from continuing and simply escalating further and further.
I suppose what i'm talking about here is 'stopping power' for instance if you use the stopping power of a knife then you'll have to stab the person alot or stab them in the heart or the neck to prevent them from coming back at you, and the chances are that person will end dead from loss of blood. It strikes me that it would be much better to use the stopping power of a gun then all you'd have to do is shoot them in the arm and then keep the gun pointed at them until some sort of help arrives, the point being to straight away escalate the fight right to its end point that way you don't get as badly harmed and and you can keep the harm to you're opponent down to a minimun.

Bullying

It seems to me that every possible answer is put forward for the problem of bullying but the most obvious and most amidiatly affective answer that of empowering the bullied to fight back. It seems to me that we do everything possible to not empower the bullied we tell them that violence is never the answer, we tell them that if they were to fight back then they would just be bringing themselves down to their level, we even try and teach them to feel sorry for the bully because they are probably emotionaly damaged and anable to express their pain in any other way, and do you know what? their probably right bullys probably are for the most part emotionaly damaged and certainly do need counciling but being morally superior to them isn't going to help you much if you're getting you're arse kicked.

Poetic justice: as placed in opposition to those that would destroy a persons right to make their own choices.

Those who wish to stop other people from having sex and make moves towards that objective, be it through legislature or simple physical force are in my eyes every bit as bad as those who force others to have sex i.e. rapists. As far as I am concerned these to actions are essentially the same thing, it is the blatant and brutal removal of a persons freedom to choose [a thread] that runs through both actions and by that argument through any other action that seeks to takes away a persons choice on any matter relating to their body and affecting no one else’s. For instance forcing someone to continue with a pregnancy that they would wish to abort and I suppose although it is a less likely course of action forcing someone to terminate a pregnancy that they would have otherwise have kept. For rapists, be they the type that prevents or the type that forces, the crime is the same the punishment also. For a start, they should be prevented from ever having sex themselves and secondly sex should be forced on them in the same way that they would force it on others or forcibly [or otherwise] take it away from others. For those that would prevent someone’s desired course of action with relation to their pregnancy then the punishment would be on one hand to prevent the person from ever having a child of their own and at the same time through the use perhaps of electrical stimulation and mechanical apparatus the person should be forced through the pain both of pregnancy and child birth the exact number of times that there are people that they would have forced to continue with their pregnancy. For those who would force the use of a drug on someone or prevent someone from using their drug of choice, choice being an important word here, they should for a start have the drugs forced on them and secondly have any drug that they might use, be it alcohol or pain killers taken away from them. The point of al of this being to take away their choice in exactly the same way they have taken away others, the only way such justice could be circumvented is for the criminal to prove that his or her crime was the result of a chemical, societal, neurological or cultural imbalance that can be done away with by the use of therapy and/or some other course of treatment, my punishments may be harsh but I do after all believe in the idea of rehabilitation.
A persons right to make choices that only directly affect themselves is absolute, there could be many perfectly rational reasons why one would feel the need to kill someone for instance preventing someone from moving down a course of action that would directly and perhaps negatively affect you but there could never be any rational reason why one should be able to take away a persons right to choose, it is one could well imagine these right and these alone that separate civilisation from savagery.

Have you noticed...........

that in 'Futurama' none of the stereotypically jewish characters are actually jewish [Zoidberg, Leela's parents] where as in Matt Groening other more popular series,
'The Simpsons' none of the steriotypically jewish characters are not jewish.

Places on the bus: The child

When you are a child, say from 1 or 2 to 11 or 12 years of age, you instinctively wish to go up stairs and sit at the very front of the bus, this is for 2 reasons firstly you have an instictive interest in the outside world as you know so little about it and this gives you the best view in the bus, and secondly it gives you a feeling of power as this is the same position that the driver sits in and with you're childish imagination you imagine perhaps that it is you driving the bus.

next: the teenager.

Recipe number something something.

Last night I had a cheese omelet with lettuce and Pringles sprinkled inside [Pringles are a type of crisp, the ones I used were sour cream and onion flavored]. What I did was this I fried the egg until the base of it was quite brown then I put in the cheese [it was Red licester] then I sprinkled some crunched up Pringles into it and then I put a bit of chopped up lettuce into it. By this time the cheese was quite melted so I folded it and left it frying on a low light for a while [about ten seconds] and then dished it up onto the plate. Unfortunately I forgot to dry the greece of so it was to greasy and I also put to much cheese in and the pan I used was a bit small so the egg ended up being to thick and I ended up not being quite able to finish it. As it turned out this wasn't so much an experimental recipe as a learning experience. I learned that lettuce tastes really nice when its fried and thus my next omelet will just have lettuce in it and I learned that sprinkling pringles into an egg will make it taste to salty and thus next tim Id o such a thing I'll make a cheese omelet with un-salted crisps sprinkled into it.

War in Israel, [why is it that in this font atleast capital i's look just like normal l's, how the bright shmuck that came up with that idea]

The war in Israel has just turned official, Hamas are now the legitimate, democratically elected government of the Palestinian territories. They don't have a military wing, they have an army. They're not terrorists or para-militarys, they're something worse, a government. When they bomb Israeli targets, its not terrorism, its war. And when the Israelis bomb beaches and kill civilians Hamas now have a legal right, perhaps even a responsibility to strike back. Now perhaps because of the actions of Israel, when Hamas kills civilians they can call it collateral damage instead of terrorism. Business as usual for most governments.

Recommended.

go to

www.fiendicide.tk

when you do, tell them i sent you.

ow my head, or as comic book guy from the simpsons would say 'worst, headache ever!'.

ow my head,
it hurts like I have a really tight,
and really heavy helmet on, I feel as though if I were to move my head to fast, the weight would break my neck.
I feel the hand of god on me and he's squeezing real hard.

No cookies

Sorry for not posting on here yesterday, but the computer insisted that it would not work untill it had some cookies, I tried inserting some chocolate chip ones but this didn't seem to go down to well with library staff and so I just left it at that. However, allthough it is working slowly today the computer has allowed me to axcess blogger and thus I asume that the library staff have fed it some cookies in the correct manner, in any case, onwards and upwards.

Bush bashes gays, I bash Bush [no intended innuendo]

President suspect George Bush has recently decided that he's going to placate his socially conservative Christian base by once again attempting to ban gay marriage, or if you're a supporter of this bill, define marriage as the union of a man and a woman. This has been labeled by many commentators as nothing more than a token gesture as it is claimed that Bush knows it is doomed to fail I however think that it is most probable that Bush knows nothing about nothing about nothing. In any case the aurgument for this bill is that marriage is mankinds oldest established concept [or words to that affect] , and this may well be true [allthough i think that it isn't] but then slavery was and is also a very longly established action within society it in fact still goes on today, in some parts of the world, but its longetivity is no reason to big it up, it is no reason not to wipe it of the face of the planet. I am not equating marriage with slavery [allthough some who have gone through it may dissagree] but actually marriage does have some simmilaritys to slavery. Historically marriage represented the ownership of the women by the man, [proof of this is found in the fact that untill reletively recent the couple would be refered to as man and wife the implication being that allthough the husband remains a man the women is now simply a wife] and the ownership of the man and the woman by the state or local lord [proof of this is found in the fact that if one wanteed to get maried then it used to be that one would have to ask for the permission of the local lord who had the power to refuse you, this is not dissimilar to the modern practice of marriage registration i.e. any marriage that is not registered is not considered to be legal]. the Bushes and there supporters claim that this is not about bashing gays it is simply about protecting the institution of marriage but this is not met out in the second major reason that they have given to prove the neccesity of this bill and that is that marriage must be protected because it has all of these benifits, I won't bother listing them but suffice it to say that any benifit derived from a marriage is down to the two people involved with the marriage and not the institution of marriage itself, in any case if this bill had nothing to do with bashing gays then the bill supporters would not by implication be suggesting that these benifits should or indeed must be kept away from gay people.

Bush is an idiot if he thinks this will work, or maybe he's not an idiot cos he knows it won't, or maybe he's an idiot because he knows it will work. In an America were a womens [long fought for] right to control what happens in her own body, is being rappidly being eroded, nothing can be taken for granted.

go here

http://farkleberries.blogspot.com/

Today in today.

The omen remake is being released today, the sixth day of the sixth mounth of the sixth aka 666 mark of the beast, unfortunately for these film makers it has been discovered in the earliest translations of the new testament that the actual number of the beast is 616 meaning they would have had to release the film in january to get the numbers to match up correctly.
However, whatever the numbers no ammount of superstition can prevent me from not seeing this film. The fact of the matter is that it did not need to be made, there is nothing wrong with the original movie, it can't be improved on, it as simple as that. The only reason why anyone in their right and good mind, would want to remake it is so they could then go on to remake the sequals to it, which first time round really weren't that good and certainly could be improved on. Therefore if they do go on to remake those as well then I will most deffinetly go to see them or atleast rent them on DVD later on.

New phrase. [what is this the 3rd i've put on here the 4th maybe? well whatever]

Smash the granny out of it.
Essentially equal in meaning to the phrase beat the shit out of it.
Example of usage:
"I smashed the granny out of it" or "you got the granny smashed out of you".

Kindly provided without permission by Mark Andrew Jones.
He's not on blogger he's just some guy I know.

Bad habits.

Among my bad habits are picking my nose, biting my finger nails [i actually bite them from one side to the other so actually i'm really just trimming them] and, reading on the toilet; all of which are quite if not very common, but i've recently noticed a new one that i'm not so sure about. Waving the curser around and clicking on the little moving globe thingy and the increasing bar thingum that shows you how much time you have left for something to load up or something like that, in the [perhaps] mistaken belief that it will cause it to do so more quickly when in fact because you are giving the computer more information to deal with it is considerably more likely to slow it down further. The two things i'm not sure about are for a start how common is this practice and secondly, i'm often quite convinced that it does in fact speed up the process but how can that be.

Another thing,
why is it the lucinda grande and georgia font types are completely identical?
Also should blogger make more fonts available?

One thing i just can't stand, or, What i've got a bug up my arse about today.

I really can't stand it when you click on the next blog button, and you end up coming to a blog that doesn't have that button. I mean come on, who the hell does something like that! The only reason I can think of why someone would do that is because they are incredibly selfish and they really, really dislike the idea, that another blog may derive some traffic from theirs. I bet they think that if they stop people from continuing travelling down the 'next blog road' and will just decide to stay there instead of angilly going back to the last blog they were on, clicking it again and hoping it doesn't send them to the same blog [which is what i usually do].

Sanctions.

There has for last few years been a great deal of talk about academic boycotts against Israel and I have always felt that they were simply token gestures that say “you know what, we don’t like what you’re doing here” in such a manner that the targeted party must take notice but not in such a manner that it does any actual damage to them. They are boycotts not sanctions they do no real harm and yet the word racist has recently started to be bandied about. This is at a time when sanctions have been levelled against the Palestinian people on the basis that they have voted in the wrong government a government that refuses to recognise a country that also refuses to recognise them and yet has no such sanctions against them. You can argue all you like about the relative hypocrisy of this but what one can not argue about is the fact that men woman and children are dying because there hospitals have no money for medicine or anything else for that matter the fact of the matter is that these sanctions are killing. If suggesting a boycott against Israeli academics is racist and in some ways it may well be, then what new word must we invent to describe the barbarity of these sanctions?

Words

People it seems have tendency towards a confusion by which they come to believe that the word synonymous means ‘the same as’ clearly that is not the case, synonymous means similar in meaning or something thereabouts it doesn’t mean ‘the same as’ or ‘alternative to’ the fact of the matter is that different words, no matter how similar to each other they may be have different meanings. The way by which this confusion arises is that it is very difficult to describe exactly how or in what manner one word has a different meaning to another without making recourse to that words synonyms. There is I believe a solution to this problem perhaps even a number of solutions.

For instance say, this word is like that word only it’s a bit colder in feel, or its more cerebrally based. For example ‘intelligent’ has a more cerebral base to it whereas ‘clever’ has a more practical base. Also one could think about the derivation of the word, think of what culture it comes from and of what concepts that culture had and which it didn’t have, say that this word comes from there and that it does not within its self have this or that concept, or one could simply say this has a more Greek feel to it whereas that is more french. This is of course something that one could not do with other languages such as french or Greek as they has very few if any words within them that come from other languages and cultures.

One other method by which this confusion arises is that people rarely learn words by having them explained to them, you learn mostly from hearing words and seeing what circumstances they are used in. Thus the final method by which this confusion could be averted is by reforming our various cultures in such a way as to make so that you would learn mainly by having words explained to you and only secondarily by hearing their usage in the outside world. The only problem with this is that it would slow down the learning process and thus slow down the rate of innovation within society, however it may also make it into a much more intelligent and thoughtful society more capable of solving its problems and those of the greater world, so perhaps the extra time and money spent on education would be worth it in the long term, which leaves only three questions.

How long will it hold up the education process?

How much more money would thus have to be spent on it?

And,

Can such an amount be affordable to society?

Dick n Dom must die.

For those of us lucky enough to have not heard of them, Dick and Dom are a British, children’s entertainment double act, most famous for an insipid piece of shit show named ‘Dick n Dom in Da Bungalow’ [or something similar to that], and beyond that, they are famous or perhaps infamous for their, ‘hilarious’ prank of going into places such as opera halls and libraries [and shopping precincts as well] and attempting to get people to scream out at the top of their lungs, the word bogies. Now I may admit that it is mildly amusing on a conceptual level, if a bit unimaginative, the point being that one goes into a place where one is not meant to make any noise at all, and not only do you shout, but you shout out a vaguely rude word. So yes I understand the concept, and I understand why it should be atleast vaguely funny, but in practice on the other hand it’s just plain annoying. There have been several occasions when I was sitting in my local library, and a bunch of flee ridden feral children come running in and start screaming bogies, and I can tell you absolutely no one laughs, at the dirty little mites, so I know from personal experience that its not at all funny. Interestingly on the most recent occasion of this happening I did actually laugh, but not at what the kids were doing but at the fact that when they screamed bogies someone shouted out “someone give them a tissue!”

just something i've noticed.

I've noticed recently that there has been a great increase of the number of video blogs being posted on here and its not that i don't like them I just think that i prefer to read something than to here someone talk about it cos i think that when you sit down and start to write you consider what you're saying more and thus there is a greater chance of it being good on the other hand the appalingly bad and uninspired quality of my recent posts on here are proof that this is not allways the case.

secrets of the da blogspot code?

Have any of you ever noticed that the collections of letters that come up in word verification often seem to be similar to certain words, or they seem as if they are words or should be words?
Perhaps someone is trying to send us a message? if this is the case then they should know that there are eisier and more direct ways to send such messages, i mean havn't they ever heard of coding secret messages into religious paintings i mean come on.

and in other news

Why is it that any collection common symbols [such as !£$%^&*] allways seems to look like a trail of expletives, is this perhaps something that has been conditioned into us by comic books and the like or is it actually something implicit in the symbols themselves. On the other hand perhaps this perception is something particular to me as many things are and other people such as you're selves do not know what the hell i'm going on about.

Give me a........

problem and i'll solve it.

Give me a..................

subject and i'll write about it.

Really appalingly un PC joke.

A man is crossing the road he is run down by a passing car and the man gets out of the car and calls for an ambulance then drives off he later decides that he should sue the man for the dammage he caused to his car, once in court they are both told they don't have a leg to stand on.

other sites

does anyone use yahoo answers if so then check out my questions and answers by looking under phillipgdmn
if not then you should but i warn you it is highly addictive.
[i know that this is a bit like publicising another company but if google (who own this site) don't like then they better just make google answers]

here's a recently posted question by me

Rate these for their level of addictiveness 1 being the lowest 10 being the highest.
wikipedia, blogger, yahoo answers.

I'm getting deja vu here have i said something like this before on here or is it just that i just wrote this on yahoo answers?

Charging us for what we allready own.

I am currantly sitting in a library in front of a computer, the same computer in fact that i had to stop sitting sitting in front only a few days ago as it refused to work but on this occasion it seems to be working just fine, before i was sitting at this computer before indeed i was even in th library i was walking thorought he car park at the back of the library and i spoted some kids knocking over a parking meter and taking the money out, had i dissagreed with what they were doing i would have had to ignore them because i'm not the sort of person to intafear in other peoples buisiness but as i walked past them i realised that i didn't have to ignore them because i agree with what they were doing, you see in th UK librarys and most carparks certainly including this one are publicaly owned which means that i own them those kids own the and if you live anywhere near me you own them to so how dare the local council actually charge us for parking our cars on our own publicaly owned property, those kids were right in what they were doing , you should do the same thing and so should I!!!!!!

Its tantamount to putting a parking ticket on a car in a persons driveway, OK not quite the same thing but as good as!!!!!!

Album review1

Rob Zombie - The sinister Urge

[Yeh I know only about four years late but better late than never and why should an album only ever be reviewed when its released and never again anyway? (if you actually have an answer for that by all means.............)]

I haven't listened to much of his stuff before but I've heard enough to have had some [in retrospect quite silly] preceptions about what the album would be like and thus when I actual started listening I was quite surprised [eventually pleasantly so] I thought that it would have a sort of thicker perhaps angrier feel to it and be somehow more focused, I was I think thinking of something somehow akin to nu-metal but instead what I got was this wonderful phantasmagoric mixture of glam rock, alt-metal, industrial, hip hop, phycedelia, horror movie soundtracks, classical, and strangely enough a real and quite unexpected pop sensibility.
If that description alone doesn't get you interested in this, then the album also has more guest slots than you can shake an arc welder at.
Extra drum work done by among others, Josh Freese [the vandals, A Perfect Circle] and Tommy Lee [Motley Crue] Danny Lohner [Nine Inch Nails]
Extra guitars Kerry King [Slayer]
guest vocals Ozzy Osbourne [ oh a little known Heavy Metal bad called Black Sabbath]

I'm now going home to watch the Rob Zombie written/ directed movie 'House of a Thousand Corpses' possibly followed by its sequel 'The Devils Rejects'.

addiction to web thingums.

First i was addicted to blogging [allthough i still do it on a regular basis i do not any compulsion to do it i don't feel i have to do it] then i was addicted to Wikipedia [i still consider myself to be a Wikipedian but i havn't written anything for some time, theres just to much there allready a rarely find any blanks on there and when i do i rarely know enough about them to write] now i am very clearly addicted to Yahoo answers where i go write under the name phillipgdmn. I think what i really like are self contained meritocracys [blogger probably isn't one but wikipedia and yahoo answers certainly are]. What i know for sure right now is that i will at somepoint tire [atleast slightly] of using yahoo answers and i feel i must plan for the future, so does anyone know of any other web thingums suitable for me to become addicted to, come on be a pusher, i don't mind if you say you're website or you're employers.

p.s.1. i'll probably mirror this in a smaller form on yahoo answers [or in this case questions] thats the level of my addiction.

p.s.2. an interesting aside, when i was a kid i allways used to insist that i was addicted to caffein [you know the stuff in coke and coffee, just incase you can't get through my bad spelling super encryption] i think i felt that this addiction some how made me more adult, perhaps this is the origin of this sort of mock addiction.

p.s.3. this is kinda a joke but please anyone who is troubled by acctual addiction by all means be offended but don't for a second believe that i wrote this just to offend you!

p.s.4 for lovers of p.s. usage the fact that 4 p.s.'s made an appearance in this little joke [or half joke certainly not a funny one] that does not mean that I am making fun of p.s. i love p.s. thats why i've written it 8 times, but by the way what does p.s. [9 times] actually stand for.

Statistics, and other uninteresting peices of information about this blog [bit of a long title wasn't that, much longer now because of this].

On this blog i have had people from:
United Kingdom, United States, France, India, Japan, Hungary, Turkey, Mexico, Canada, Romania, Republic of Moldova, Peru, and Portugal

First word written on this blog:
Hello

First subject:
Gary Glitter

second word:
all

with the exception of one anonymous comment i have not had any comments for 12 or maybe 13 posts.

Places I also post at:

www.Wikipedia.org under the same name as here.

-yahoo questions- as phillipgdmn.

%$%67^%£$^78*658

Oh my god theres some one on here now quick i better write something interesting before they leave
ah ah ah ah ah ah ah ah ah...................................................

ask me how i know

Mobile phones in restaurants [and I emphasize the rants part].

A great number of people think that mobile phones should be banned from restaurants, weather they mean that anyone caught with one should be thrown out or that you should just have to leave them at the front desk I don't know but I have allways found this strange because people talk in restaurants and no one who's against mobiles in them has suggested that they are also against talking in them in fact they often say that they want to ban the mobiles so that they can talk more easily, but I'm not sure why it matters weather someone is talking to the person next to them or a person on the end of a phone line. The only thing that I may agree with them on is that there should be a rule that would force people to turn there ringers of and also by the same reasoning not make to much noise.

I apologize for this, it is clearly an appallingly boring subject for a post, however I've taken the time to write it and indeed this so I may as well post it

Mobile "phones" [or cell "phones" if you must]

It strikes me that as mobile phones or cell phones as the yanks like to call them [more cultural imperialism from a brit who would had thought it] get more and more complex with a greater number of non call related features such as music, camera, computer games, and even internet we will have to start refering to them as something else.

my suggestions

1. Mobile cultural interaction pods [or M CIPs (pronounced em sips) as i'm sure they will come to be known as]
2. Mobile culture stations [MCS (they will shortly be refered to as macs and be marketed as such, Apple computers will then attemp to sue the various manufacturers and in achordance with the curse of the beatles they will fail]
3. Mobile entertainment network stations [never refered to as mens, sometimes refered to as mobens]
4. Mobile culture network entertainment stations or pods [ allways written as Mob C/N/E stations or Mob C/N/E Pods]

If you have any suggestions of you're own I would welcome them, remeber the future of the mobile phone may depend on you!

If any of the cultural referances in this or any othe post have gone over you're head then please don't hesitate to ask and I will indevour to explain as best I can.

The return of the strange recipes, two of them in fact.

Firstly a brief explanation of my intentions.

1. These recipes are not jokes.
2. All recipes put forward here have been tried and tested.
3. The recipes put forward here are the product of careful thought, not simply combining things randomly.
4. Previously they have been written in a blow by blow, cook book type style. this is no more from now on they will be written simply and i will allow you to fill in the blanks.

I hope that these number points have cleared somethings up.

Recipe 1

Spinach and Apple juice: Tip, make sure the spinach you are using is quite mulchy as it will have to hold a small amount of liquid.

Recipe 2

Sugar Puff and peanut butter sandwich: Tip, make sure that the layer of peanut butter is for a start put on first and secondly think enough to hold a number of sugar puffs and allso not allow the sugar puff flavour to completely over power the peanut butter flavour.

More blah blah blah

I presume by the fact that you left no comments that you did indeed wish me to write something better. I will hence forth work my way towards doing so, though i may be some time.

Destruction Earth

It is quite often said that their is a commet or meteorite of some sort heading for us [the earth] in 2066 or something there abouts and that it may or may not be big enough to wipe out the planet or rather the various things that live on it [humans for example] it is allso often said that various geverments are doing nothing to combat this the resons for this what could they be?

1. The world is run by death cultists who want the world to die.
2. There is nothing that can be done about it.
3. Those in power wish to use this opportunity to wipe out most of the population and start again. [while they of course are on the moon]
4. They know that in fact there is nothing heading for us and they just made it up to distract us.

I can think of no other possibilitys, perhaps you can?

Flaws in these ideas may or may not be.

1. weather they want us dead, know they can't do anything, or are death cultists, why don't they simply give the impression of doing something?

Either this that or the orther and we're screwed either we're dead or being massively manipulated and most probably both.

I wish...........

That i could filter out my own visits to my blogs [i can't cos i don't log on from the same computers] but i susspect that if i did i would have very little site traffic showing up on the counters and meters.

What do you wish for right this instant?
Maybe that i should write something better?

I hate it when............................

I click on next blog and it brings me to something not written in English, not that i have anything against other languages its just that i only speak english and I just wish that there was some sort of built in filtering tool on here cos it seems to happen to me all the time to me.

I go to make a comment only to realise that the button I clicked is just the one to view the comments and that I have to click on another one to make my comment, I wonder why I bother sometimes.

What do you hate right now?

Hello Mr self obsessee.

I now have one site meter one site tracker and one site counter.
Beat that!

Libertarianism in England

In my recent post on libertarianism I suggest that it may well be all but dead in the
United States but it seems that things may well be going the same way over here [England] what with Tony Blairs New labor [and I emphasize the 'new' over the 'labor'] government currently [for all intents and purposes] attempting to repeal human rights laws and with the general shift of things towards arguments such as 'the rules of the game have changed' [proving perhaps that while people are dying politicians really do think of it just as a game] but having said that atleast we have some sort of discussion over it I mean I don't have anything against America [or atleast not for the purposes of this post I don't] but it seems to me that you have some of the best human rights laws in the world but you're government just ignores them and you let them get away with it and any one who suggests that they shouldn't be ignoring these laws or even that the government must adhere to law as much as anyone else is labeled a terrorist or atleast a sympathizer certainly they are seen as being grossly unpatriotic, well you know what we have people like that over here as well and although the government certainly doesn't like them [there was one incident when a 70 year old man was thrown out of a public meeting for shouting 'rubbish!' at jack straw] we don't do anything like that to them we don't slander them and we probably wouldn't get away with it if we tried to [why do I keep on saying we?]. Two things that can allmost allways be said about our politicians is that for a start they're not quite as bad as yours and secondly they will allmost allways defend libertarian ideals while in opposition and allmost allway shit in their faces when their in power!

A (or some) new word(s depending on what i feel like putting down when i'm finished with the first).

Shonky
Combining shoddy and wonky having within its meaning elements of both words.

[Credit for this word goes to Jonathan creater and administrator of the blog intitled 'bloody awful poetry' which contains within it no poetry.]

Other examples of this sort of thing: (this type of word not this sort of credit giving)

Meld
Combining mold and weld having within its meaning ellements of both words.

I think i choose 'A' instead of 'some'.

Myself the walking contradiction.

I'm a living, breathing, talking, walking contradiction.
I'm a pedant but I'm rubbish at speelling.
I'm a self deprecating egotist.
I'm rather reserved but love to monopolies conversation.
I'm obsessed by theorys but see things only as they are.
I'm an optimistic, pessimistic, realist.
I am myself and a million different selves all of them concrete and unchanging all of them upfront and in charge of my body all of the time.

updates, sugestions and some questions

If you look at my previous post on the subject of American libritarinism as well as a small number of other posts you will noticed that i have highlighted certain words and phrases by making them larger than the rest of the text and i was just wondering................

1. Do you like it?
2. Does it make it difficult to read the text?
3. Have I highlighted the correct words?

I only ask because I think that I will be continueing to do this on any post that I feel to be of a serious political nature.

OK thats the questions and updates done with now onto the..................

1. Come here in greater numbers.
2. Get a site meter for you're blog.

site meters are great, you can find out so much about the people who log onto you're site, for instance I recently had my first person come on here who was not from either the UK or America, they were from Turkey ain't it swell.

some random things for today1

Question.................. people allways or atleast quite often say talking to yourself is one of the first signs of madness and allways think and often or atleast sometimes ask 'if thats the first then what are the others' i've never gotten a satisfactory answer in fact i've rarely if ever gotten an answer at all. I would suggest that if thats the first sign then the second would be actually answering back and perhaps the third would be not finding this to be a strange thing.

Is libertarianism dead in America and if so who or what killed it?

It seems to me that America was founded on the principles of libertarianism and it shocks me to think how far away from those ideals they have gone.
I would imagine that the founding fathers would be aghast to know that America now uses patriotism and the threat of tragedy as weapons of tyranny against their own people. One wonders that if they new that would they have pushed so hard to break away from English rule or would they have instead pushed for great reform of the entire British empire and the rules that govern it. I happen to think that had they done this and succeeded then the British empire may well have continued much longer than it did perhaps it would even exist today instead of this farcical shadow form that it takes now. I happen to think also that had this been achieved then the world of today would be a much better place for it, but all of that is mere historic speculation and it does not distract me long from the fact that libertarian ideal are in America atleast and to all intents and purposes dead, leaving us with only one question who or what did who committed this great crime this great murder this great injustice for they committed it against the very people of America and for that matter the people of all the world. In answer to that question I can offer you one word..... religion..... more so than that and more percificaly Christianity. Christianity murdered the libertarian ideal and why wouldn't it doesn't the constitution grant not only freedom of religion but also freedom from religion.
But it had to be religion didn't it what else could cause the American people to allow such ideals that have protected them for so long to be thrown out................ well theres allway laziness i suppose, and America's bellys are testiment to your aptitude at that.

favourite phrase

move yo fat arse, i say it to cars as they slow down when you're at a crossing and the cars to close for you to cross and you just want it to speed up so you can cross the road but it doesn't and you don't know weather it thinks its doing you a favour and can't understand why you havn't crossed or its just doing it to anoy you cos its a sadist or its just bored and wants some entertainment and you can't imagine what level of entertainment it would derive from this situation but then it is a car so you imagine that it would have a particulaly carcentric way of thinking and sense of humour and then it passes and you cross over and forget about it.

title goes here. [this has nothing to do with the following text]

i find that i've got so used to using www.wikipedia.org that when i come on here i expect some one else to have updated this. if you don't know what wikipedia is then i'll tell you "simply send......." only joking [but on the square by allmeans send me something] wikipedia is an online encyclopedia which allows anyone to edit any page on it, you should all join it, it kicks ars, its even better than blogspot in many ways allthough having said that it is an encyclopedia its not a place to publicise you're self or write essays but it does kick arse in fact i might just go back there now, hope to see you there.

Globalization an Communism.

Communism or Socialism can by their very nature only work if those involved in them are close enough to be able to talk to each, this is because Communism is based on the idea, or perhaps ideal of co-operation. If people aren't close enough to talk then they can't co-operate thus things end up going through the government which ends up with people simply having things forced on them at which point the the government stops being communist. That's why communism has allways worked better in smaller countries such as Cuba and Vietnam than in large countries such as Russia and China. Communism is far from dead in Russia but it is for all intents and purposes no longer in power it has been replaced with a Soviet un-union and as for China communism there has not lived in a while and has been replaced either with non-free market Capitalism or free market Communism or Comitalism or Capmunism.
Ironically Globilization the tool of Capitalism allows co-operation to spread accross the whole globe, all that stops it is human nature which the Communist have failed to wipe out and the Capitalist have failed to fully exploit..... or have they?

My heroes, and inspirations:

Howard Stern, Larry Flynt, Marilyn Manson,
Boyd Rice, Alistair Crowley,
Anton LaVey, Vladimir Lenin, Jello Biafra,
Ice T, Ho Chi Min, Fidel Castro,
John Lydon, Henry Rollins.

Questions:

1. How are things?
2. Where are you and what can you see out of the window?
3. What was the last thing you put in you're mouth?
4. What rumor would you like to start about yourself?
5. What would you do if you were a member of the opposite sex for a day?
6. What would you like to change about yourself?
7. what's you're fantasy?
8. What do you look for in a partner?
9. What are you obsessed with?
10. What would surprise people about you?
11. Who would you most like to have a drink with?
12. What was the last lie you told?
13. what's you're favorite swear word?
14. What song would you like played at you're funeral?
15. [Finish this sentence] Happiness is.......

My ambitions in no particulalar order:

To have enouth money to play monopoly with real money.

To have a house nice enouth to show on MTV's Cribs.

To make some truly great art.

To write some truly great literature.

To make some truly great music.

To be immortal.

To take over the world.

To make it so all words are spelt phoenetically [that means how they sound].

I keep on getting spam E-mails [its only really a spam E-mail if its something you don't want or need] for penis enlargments and viagra [the phrase keep that burning flame burning longer is often used] am i on some wierd mailing list or what?

I'm just wondering if any of you know me from other websites and chatrooms these are the aliases that I have gone under at various points I hope no one remembers how much they hate me

Flip G

Taurus or Master Taurus or Taurus 3001

Starmeat

The Duke of DaDa

Sylvio Belesconi is now officially the ex priminister of Italy he has, finally, three weeks after losing the election he has conceded that he has been beaten by his 'insane communistic Stalin loving opponent' interestingly one of the many insane things he said during the election was "I am the Jesus Christ of politics, I sacrifice myself for everyone" this is interesting because Stalin also fancied himself as a bit of a Jesus Christ he also shares many of the same mercurial personality traits with Belesconi so I think for that and any number of other reasons the country is well rid of him however I suspect that he may make a come back sooner rather than late as the election was so close that no one could possibly form a viable government out of it thus they will have to call another election and then it will be round " Jesus Christ versus Stalin" although I may add that Italy coalition system of government may prevent the necessity of a second election.

did you know that achording to the bible code this is the year the worlds meant to end?
Well only just under 7 mounths for it to be proved right!
The problem with this is that you may laugh at it but if enough people believe it'll happen then it might well do they might acctually make it happen not so much because of their beliefe in it but because of the way they act in achordance with those beliefs thus to protect ourselves we must track these people down and wipe them out. Of course the resulting war may be so huge that it'll prove to be the end of the world and so it may be a self fufilling prophesy. The best thing to do is to just put it out of you're mind and act as if you've got a million years left to live. Of course me putting it in you're head via this blog isn't going to help matters so perhaps you should just forget a blout thins and move on to
www.nouveaupostmablog.blogspot.com
which has been updated.

It is strange to think that one day in the not to distant future an E-mail sent by a famous person will be worth just as much as a letter written by a person of similar fame this is for two reasons, firstly an E-mail is not a physical thing in any common sense of the word and people still have a problem with the idea of something non physical having worth comparable to the physical, it is perhaps how the attitude to ideas and theories once was and it is also the reason why it was once felt that the soul was actually some sort of previously undiscovered organ of the body and also why the ancient Chinese believed that heaven was an island paradise in the west however with the growth on one hand of science and on the other the spiritualist movement these feelings mostly disappeared. Secondly, it is usually the case that the rarer something is the more worth it has and what’s more this piece of information is well infiltrated into the public consciousness, we write e-mails all the time therefore they have a worth in relation to that, the same was perhaps true of letters however eventually that method of communication was displaced and thus became a rarer thing a preserve of the richer or rather the better off with more time on their hands did they become more worthy because of there rarity or because of who writes them? In any case, in order for this to happen to e-mail they will have to be displaced by another more advanced method of communication. Considering the dumbing down of language, this will probably be something that involves less language not more I can however not quite think what this could possibly be I do however think that this dumbing down process will end up with our species coming full circle and re-developing our primordial senses and communicating primarily through body language and smell only we’ll be able to send smells and pieces of body language over long distances. However being an obsolete method of communication used only by the rich, important, interesting, powerful, and pretentious may not make it as an expensive item no matter what people think of the immaterial because e-mails are saved in so many different places and are almost impossible to get rid of entirely doing massive purges. So, there you go I’ve come to the conclusion that I was wrong.

Whats up with Robin William’s hair I saw him on the daily show and it looks practically red, certainly a rather more let us say or rather me say robust brown. I’m guessing that he’s using the same hair dye as Arnold “The Governator” who featured in the conversation. Why on earth do they have such rubbish hair colour can’t they afford something better? I mean aren’t they meant to be rich movie stars or something? Perhaps they chose such colorants for comedy purposes or for a new movie certainly that is potentially true of Williams but “The Governator” of course isn’t in that business anymore.

In England there is a prison release practice whereby foreign prisoners are upon release considered, also for deportation, this I have always felt is wrong as it amounts to punishing a person twice. A person goes through a trial they can plead they can talk to the judge and jury and they have a lawyer in short, they have rights. Once the trial is over they are found either guilty or not guilty and they’re either exonerated and let free or sentenced and sent to prison or indeed fined or given community service. Once they have completed their sentence they are [theoretically at least] considered to have fully paid their debt they may be released with certain conditions but these are discussed openly in a meeting of some sort. They are not summarily sentenced again but this time without the trial without the lawyers without the judge and jury and without any rights. What has happened recently is that some small amount over a thousand foreign prisoners were released without being considered for deportation out of those one thousand or so prisoners two were convicted of murder, three of manslaughter, nine of rape and fifty-nine of other serious violent offences this adds up to seventy-three which is around about seven percent. Because of this measly figure the government has come under fire and the home secretary Charles Clarke has been asked to resign and as a result of this he has apologised.
How sickening.

Guns n Roses’[really and truly Axl Rose’s] new album Chinese Democracy will be released when China actually has democracy, the rumours of the album are simply a ploy to have their fans work towards achieving Chinese democracy, because if you want to hear the album then that’s what its going to take. It’s a crying shame that this is what it takes to get Axl Rose fans to get off their arses and do something for the world but there it is.

damn damn damn damn damn my sidebars gone to the bottom again now its a bottom bar how in blazers do i stop this from happening isn't there some way to give it a fixed position and have the width of posts adjusted or something?

The greatest………..


Story ever told: Neil Gaiman’s The Sandman.

Album ever written: David Bowie’s Diamond Dogs.

Computer game: Sid Meier’s Alpha Centauri.

Movie ever made: Oliver Stone’s Natural Born Killers.

Painting: Pablo Picasso’s Gurnica

Performance: the first airing of Igor Stravinsky’s The Rights of Spring.

Politician: Hassan Sabbah founder and leader of the Assassins, or Vlad Tepes.

Cartoon ever made: Futurama or The Simpsons or South Park or Family Guy or American Dad or Ren and Stimpy Or Earthworm Jim [it was a cartoon as well as a computer game].

Food ever cooked: the Omelette.

Drink ever distilled: Whiskey.


Disclaimer: Title should be proceeded by ‘in my opinion which may change at any moment’.

Rob is short for Robert, Bob however is also short for Robert and not for Bobert or even Borert. Rich is short for Richard, Dick however is also short for Richard and not Dichard or even Dicharr, Rik and Rick also are short for Richard but not Rickard.
Rickard, Dichard, Dicharr, Bobert, Borert are not it is said, real names, however the same I suppose could once in the deep bowels of time been said for Robert and Richard.

www.nouveaupostmablog.blogspot.com
has been updated

Thought for the day, you may not find it usefull it may depress you beyond beliefe but it is my thought and you can have no say in it.

It used to be that i would log into my e-mails and find that i have msgs pending to be read and often from the same person i became so used to it that i often saw it as an annoyance these feelings are now like distant memorys of another place and another time, a place where certain things could be taken for granted,
"oh no, its raining hotdogs again, imean its not as if i don't like them but its not terribly nice when their falling on you like this, i mean...... i think kittens are cute as well but i don't want thousands of them falling on my head and i would amagine the kittens wouldn't like it much either ....but .... oh yes, the dirrections to the market its just........." and two weeks later it hasn't rained for a week and "oh god! where is hotdog rain when you need it! curse you!"

And

Something can go horridly wrong, and it can go horribly wrong.
And something can be horrid, but it can not be horrib.

Also

Cunt is seen as a more insulting term for the vagina and yet vagina is derived from a word meaning the sheath of a sword whereas cunt is derived from a word meaning little triangle.

It seems strange to write two lines and then start a new post simply because you have changed subject so I thought I’d put these in the same post, a post now made slightly [three lines] longer via this completely unnecessary explanation.

Charles Clarke the British Home Secretary has recently revealed plans to cut the amount of money available, as compensation to those who have been wrongly jailed, in order to free up more money to be spent on compensating and helping the victims of crime. How absurd! Those who have been wrongly jailed are the victims of a crime! But of course, when the state commits an illegal action it isn’t the same as when a private citizen commits a crime. If I were to go out tomorrow and shoot someone, regardless of my reasoning behind the action, it is taken as a given, that regardless of whether I am found guilty or not guilty, I will at very least be put on trial. However if a police officer shoots someone, while he is working, then you’ll be lucky to get an inquiry out of it and even then you’d have to fight to make it anything but an internal one. [Internal inquiries are in my mind just about the stupidest idea on the planet it amounts to asking the person accused of the crime to investigate themselves]. Likewise if I were to go out tomorrow grab hold of someone put them on trial and lock them up, regardless of what that person has or has not done, it would be considered to be kidnapping because the state does not grant me that power, and yet we have granted that power and indeed immunity from law to the state. Perhaps after all the anarchists have a point.

Let all who seek meaning hear and understand,

nouveau post ma blog has been updated.

www.nouveaupostmablog.blogspot.com

Ask me any question, on any world issue and I will give you my opinion on it and then i'll work out a solution to it.................... Go on try me, I dare you.

Another Game.

You will in order to play this game need a pen or pencil a peice of paper and a ruler if you like to be neat, a dart board and atleast one dart.

On the paper write down the numbers 1 to 20 perhaps in some sort of grid or table with space for ticks and crosses [thats where the ruler may come in handy] whenever you hit a number you put a tick next to it if you hit it again then you cross the tick out and then you must hit the number again inorder to put the tick back the objective of the game being to have ticks next to all of the numbers. if you hit the bulls eye or the rim around it then you get to choose any number to tick however you must not use the bullseye anymore than once every two rounds [a round being the throw of three darts] whatsmore you must not end the game with a bullseye allso if you don't hit the dart board or don't hit the playing surface of it then you must choose one of you're numbers and put a cross on it the number can be retrieved in the normal way if you do not at this point have any numbers then you will simply need to hit the choosen number twice before you can put a tick next to it.

A Game 1

You'll need atleast two people to play this but preferably no more than two

You'll need one tube map per person [ london underground map ] [ it is permissable to play it with other types of map but thats what i use ] what you need to do is fairly simple though not by any means easy you simply look at the map, choose one of the destinations, work out how to say it backwards newbury park for instance would be krap yrubwen pronounced in my mind atleast krap ye rub wen, or krap ee rub wen, then you're opponent has to gues what you're saying he or she may look at the tube map if this is what you've decided between you're selfs to do, i suggest allso that you place a time limit on each round.

The Pope has recently attacked science for what he says is "the arrogance of trying to play god without being god" is he suggesting that it should become god? He has said "it is attempting to rewrite the language of life" by which he is said to mean the use of genetics, ironically he didn't write the speech himself. And most bizzarly of all is his suggestion that science is trying to "destroy the family" this coming from a man who isn't married has no children [that we no of] and is a member of an organisation that has outlawed both in its members. Irony over load irony over load.

What a load of papul bull.

Sylvio Belesconi ex primeminister of italy recently outed by the recent elections is unsurprisingly refusing to except the results he is saying there was vote rigging and he's demanding a recount, ironically he was the man who in his role as primeminister oversaw the ellection and if there was ever a reason to bring an ellection into question him being incharge is it.

London councils break the law.

Apparantly london taxi drivers are being forced by local councils to pay parking tickets and you may think whats wrong with that i pay them why shouldn't they but when you think about it i would hope that you retract that statement, taxi have to park to pick up and drop of passengers and allso to wait for pre booked passengers its part of their job fining them [or indeed anyone for that matter]or in some other way preventing them from going about the lawfull buisiness of their job must break so many human rights laws the pro liberty organisations should be having a field day and in fact not only is this wrong not only does it break [probably] human rights laws but it infact breaks normal everyday run of the mill english law. London councils are breaking the law. And what do you think the taxi drivers are doing about this well apparently they are protesting......PROTESTING! the law is being brocken, they shouldn't be protesting they should be ringing up the police asking them to arrest members of the council. Failing that and considering for all attempts and purposes the police work for the council of course it will fail, they should refuse to pick up any members of the local council if they see them hailing a cab they should lock their doors pull up right in front of them ask them where their going and when told then say "well you'll have to find another way of doing that cos you're not getting in my cab" then explain why and then drive off or pick them up but overcharge them by enough to pay off the fine the've given you.

Question? I'm experimenting with using different font type and sizes does this help you to read this blog as its been suggested to me that white writing on a black background is difficult to read?

So Sylvio Belesconi is no longer Italian Primeminister so he goes from being the countrys most powerful man to being the countrys most powerful man i mean the guy pratically owns all the media he owns the official state broardcaster [yes i know how can one man own the state broarcaster chouldn't it be owned by the state yes it should] and the two independant broardcasters aswell as a clutch of football teams and newspapers infact now that he doesn't have to deal with being primeminister [which in his case meant going around the world insulting people] he can consentrate on his media empire so he may be even more powerfull after all the media may not control what we think but it certainly controlls what we think about it guides our thoughts and thats not such a bad thing when lots of different people with lots of different oppinions control lots of different media referance points but its potentially dissasterous it could even make some one misspell somethinkghg thats how powerful it is. of course thats the cynical view the other one is that seeing as Belesconi has something like 92 investigations into his buisiness dealings no longer being able to make the law is going to be quite disasterous for him.

I recently got this e-mail, the italics are mine i just thought it looked cool like that what do you think about the e-mail not the italics. DR.SANOU BELLO Dear, I am the head of Accounts and Audit Department of Bank of Africa,Ouagadougou . I decided to contact you after a careful thought that you may be capable of handling this business transaction which i explained below; In my department we discovered an abandoned sum of $10.5m US dollars (Ten million, five hundred thousand US dollars). In an account that belongs to one of our foreign customer who died along with his entire family in 2000 in a plane crash. Since we got information about his death, we have been expecting his next of kin to come over and claim his money because we cannot release it unless somebody applies for it as next of kin or relation to the deceased as indicated in our banking guidelines but unfortunately we learnt that his supposed next of kin (his son and wife) died alongside with him at the plane crash leaving nobody behind for the claim. It is therefore upon this discovery that I and other officials in my department now decided to make this business proposal to you and release the money to you as the next of kin (We want to present you as his busines asociate ) to the deceased for safety and subsequent disbursement since nobody is coming for it and we don't want this money to go into the Bank treasury as unclaimed Bill. The Banking law and guideline here stipulates that if such money remained Unclaimed after seven years, the money will be transferred into the Bank treasury as unclaimed fund. The request of foreigner as next of kin in this business is occasioned by the fact that the customer was a foreigner and a Burkinabe cannot stand as next of kin to a foreigner. We agree that 30% of this money will be for you as foreign partner, in respect to the provision of a foreign account, 10 % will be set aside for expenses incurred during the business and 60% would be for me and my colleagues. There after I and my colleagues will visit your country for disbursement according to the percentages indicated. Therefore to enable the immediate transfer of this fund to your account as arranged, you must apply first to the bank as next of kin of the deceased customer. Upon receipt of your reply, I will send to you by fax or email the text of the application. I will not fail to bring to your notice that this transaction is hitch free and that you should not entertain any atom of fear as all required arrangements have been made for the transfer. I expect that you contact me immediately as soon as you receive this letter. Hoping to hear from you immediately. Yours faithfully, DR .SANOU BELLO Accounts & Audit Department , Bank of AfricaNb. also give me your telephone and fax numbers for easy comunication with you.

go to this wesite theve got a really cool crazy golf game and i think i'm obssessed with crazy golf what sign of madness is that i wonder.

www.3bgames.com

In praise of lazyness

ironically in the long run without lazyness nothing would get done if we spent all the time working you'd have no time think and problems would not get solved the status quo would be thick but not the band just the same old thing all the time running around society everyone could go blind and not know what to do.

this was not mean't to rhyme.

hi everybody

what it is is that you click on the link bellow and you drw a house and answer ten questions and it works out you personality it was very accurate with mine allso you're house will join mine

http://www.drawahouse.com/takethetest/index.asp?street=d6e0fa7a6d0efab44c25dac0f95823a3

To view your street just visit:
http://www.drawahouse.com/streets/sun-will-detroy-you-wether-you-like-it-or-not-street/

mundane conspiracy

OK so get this i'm on this course that the job centre has sent me on it is strangly enough called the european computer driving licence [like i'm going to jump on my moniter and take it out for a spin] and i'm moving through the modules quite happily and then suddenly like outta the blue we are informed that our for want of a better word "teacher" is going on holiday for two weeks [golfing in spain] fine we think but as it turns out fine it was and is not he lets call him Mork is the only person at this place who is allowed to mark the tests in fact without him we can't even do them we have to console ourselves by doing the mock exams but as it turns thats a waste of time cos no one can mark them so we don't know what we've got wrong and what we need to improve on and whats more the guy who is temporarily replacing him lets call him moshua is completely inafective you ask him to do somthing for you like print out a mock cos you don't have anything better to do and you're still be waiting hours later whatsmore we have now been informed that they have another group coming in there shortly and that they don't have enough computers for both of us [not that they have enough for just us either] so we'll have to have a day each, its bloody rediculous.......................

and i say its a conspiracy.

Think about it, i rekon they think that if they just make being on this course really hellish then we'll be more likely to just get up get a job and get outta there, thus saving the job centre a lot of money.

How exactly can an exception prove a rule?

The only way that i can think of is if i were to state that everyone is a lier, and then someone was proven to be telling the truth then i would be proven to be a lier and therfore correct in my statement and therefore not a lier thus creating a parodox.

Perhaps i'm getting the wrong end of the stick, and perhaps there is no stick.

I Have noticed recently a story in one of my local news paper the ilford recorder about a school that had problems with national front activists asking students to show their support by shaving their heads and that as a result of this they had banned all students from having hair bellow a certain length and that as a result of that a young black child with hair under that certain length had been expelled from the school the mother of the young boy obviously ouraged by this asked the school to make an exceptioon and only have the rule applied to white childre but was told by the school that they could not do this as it would be construed as racist the mother even angrier at thatb remark refersed to it as political correctness gone mad [it seems that political correctness is going mad on a daily basis if we are to believe the newspapers] and i agree with her however not for the same reason the madness of political correctness is that it often seems to dictate that black people can't be racist and that is something that the mother seems to agree with. Th ubsurdity of this case really and truely has nothing to do with politicall correctness and everything to do with lack of observation skills crew cuts and crops are very popular hair cut in the UK, they are worn by people of all races , they are easy to manage and always smart, they were not invented by racist and they should not be handed over to them through fear of asociation.

P.S. i don't have short hair so i'm not biased.

I am growing to dispise mouses without scroller wheels, its just one of those things like when you think that somethings stupid and that you'll never get used to it and then suddenly you don't know how you got by without it and then you really notice it when you don't have it like heated toilet seat or square water melon oh the pain oh the unbareble pain.

Ah only 40 people away from my 1000th user who i wonder will it be gyrobo perhaps, or doubtingwise, or da katz and reni, or phenomenom the posibilities are endless.
I apologise if i've left anyone out or if i misspelled any of you're names, long term readers will know that i am prone to such faults, in any case if you are the 1000th user simply make a comment on this post and you will receive no prize but you will ammuse me for a few seconds and perhaps even your self, now who can ask for more than that.

I am greatly destressed to see that you have not left me any new comments, one felt that you would make comments on my website recomedation perhaps asking me if i was being payed anything by these people and that this was some sort of stealth advertising, or perhaps just thanking me for the recomendation and saying how much they enjoyed playing the available games but alas it seems that have to put down a proper post which you will no doubt see before this one, but then we've been through this sort of thing before have'nt we.

P.S. is it you think wrong to say something on here clearely aimed only at my long term readers something which a person logging onto this blog today for the very first time would not understand, and i may add that the correct answer to this is a resounding, no don't be so stupid.

I heartelly endorse this web site www.theloop.uk.com

Definition of terrorism:

Terrorism is when someone attempts to pursue their aims, through actions, calculated to inflict terror upon someone who watches them or is involved with them. Therefore the best way to deal with such things is to ignore them, thus limiting there effectivness. However in order to do so one would have to enforce a media blackout and thus withhold information from the public causing massive ammounts of distrust and thus making the terrorist action several times more powerfull than they would have been had you done nothing in this area.

...........................................................................

Also terrorism need not be practiced violently and it need not be practiced on a civillian population it is simply anything calculated to cause terror. By this definition a horror movie or story could be classed as terrorism therefore for the good of the nation, nay the world, we must lock up Stephen King and hold him without trial and without ready access to a legal reprasentative.

...........................................................

Also by this definition the entire justice system is an action of terrorism because it seeks to prevent crime by making potential criminals [thats everyone] scared of what may happen to them if they are caught sentences are even handed out purely for this reason and sometimes to the detrement of the persons rehabilitation.

Technorati Profile

Technorati Profile

Everyone's a cyborg.

If one excepts the definition of a cyborg to be the combination of mechanical apiratus and living tissue then we are all cyborgs. No one lives without the use of some machine even in the poorist countries they have eye glasses and watches, and allthough we are not making these objects part of our bodys they are being made part of our body processes. If i wish to see clearly i put on my glasses i.e. I take a non organic object, not part of my body and make it function as if it were part of my body. This is in effect a very simple, primitive form of that nightmareish sci fiplot device cybernetics, whatsmore this is not a trend that will be reversed any time soon nor should it be for really and truely this is just an extension of tool making, it is simply that the tools are coming closer and closer to the user and they no more change our nature or compromise our humanity than any the taking of a painkiller does.

Orange thoughts blue reality.

Anything that you can see is not the colour that it seems to you to be, the colour you see is made from the light that is reflected by the object, the objects actual colour is the sum total of all the colours that you can't see, an orange is in fact blue and as such should be called blue and hence forth from myself shall be called such, but alas when i speak of a blue i'll allways be thinking orange.

A Riddle

What is neither real nor fake?

Did you know that the first person to be recorded as saying "truth is stranger than fiction" was the great romantic poet Lord Byron.

new recipe

get an egg, beat it, put into cream cheese butter and fruit juice, cook it in the microwave or oven, do not fry it, if you feel you must fry it then don't put any butter in it it'll be greasy enough without it.

Israeli land grab?

When israel built its wall, it insisted that it was purely for defence, and yet it was often built on plestinian land often built in such a way as to split small towns in half and built over atleast one olive tree orchard owned by a palistinian family for over a hundred years, and still they said it is no land grab, and yet the new goverment is now saying that they are going to set israels final borders along the lines of the wall which brings me to my next point, the voting in of hamas is good for israel because it allows them to justify to the international community not having any negotiations with the palistinians on this issue above all others [the final borders of israel and therefor the final borders allso of palistine] if for instance tommorow hammas were to say that they officialy renounce terrorrism and recognise the state of israel then the israelis would have a real problem on their hands.

Some thing interesting happened to me recently, i met a friend that i hadn't seen for some small ammount of weeks and if truth be told had only known slightly longer we began to talk and then he said i heard that you'd had some money problems regardless of wether this is true or not and it is i was greatly shocked to hear him say this as i had not spoken to him about this i wondered who had told him and then realised that i hadn't told any one that he would have been speaking to i suddenly got the feeling that he was stalking me and felt very strange indeed and not sure what to do or say i think my jaw may even have flapped a bit however the feeling passed as quickly as it came when he said something along the lines of "i read it on you're blog".